7 July, 2000
July 7, 2000
Matanuska Glacier, Alaska
For the first time I woke to perfectly clear blue skies and the morning air was much warmer than usual as a result. It looked like a perfect day to get out on the glacier and begin work. However, the plans that Ben and I had for the day had to be put on hold as we do not have access to a working ISCO water sampler as yet. This is a critical piece of equipment for what we will be trying to do in this project. Our time was still put to good use helping with the tasks required in getting some of the CRREL water samples filtered, dried and weighed.
During the past couple days we visited locations that will become very familiar to us during this research - the moulins and vents of the Matanuska Glacier. The vents occur at the terminus of the glacier and there is a small number of them. Moulins however are all over this glacier and all water running into them must eventually exit through these vents. When you consider that this glacier is almost four miles wide at its terminus and extends roughly 27 miles back into the Chugach Mountains, there must be an awful lot of moulins around. What Ben and I will be trying to do is determine what happens to water that flows into a moulin. Is it possible that each moulin has its own path to its own vent at the terminus? Obviously that cannot be the case as there are few vents but many moulins. Perhaps several different moulins connect along the way just like surface streams and rivers. Maybe they connect and separate again, perhaps into even more branches than originally came together. Could there be subglacial lakes that they dump into along the way? Is there actually a water table at some depth in the ice just as there is on land? How can this be determined when we cannot see under the ice?
What we will be trying to do is answer some of these questions and more. Perhaps what we find will raise still more questions. The method that we will employ to try to find answers is called dye tracing. If a moulin connects to a parcticular vent then if we dump a quantity of dye into the moulin that dye should appear in the water rushing out of the vent. One problem with the water coming out is that it is filled with very fine parcticles of sediment and is extremely cloudy. How can we possibly see the dye in such murky samples? And even if the water were free of sediment, perhaps it would be too dilute to see by the time it comes out. Imagine throwing a few packs of Kool-Aid into a stream and then looking at the water downstream. We will use an instrument called a fluorometer to detect and measure the amount of a special dye that we will be using. It is very sensitive and can detect extremely small amounts of this dye in a sample of water. I will go into more detail about this instrument at a later date.
The dye we are using is rather expensive and so in the beginning we will take a different approach. We donít want to waste dye if it does not turn up at the vent we are sampling. As a result we will begin by dumping rock salt solutions into the moulins. If the salt comes out the vent we will detect its presence by noticing an increased conductivity in the water sample. Absolutely pure water does not conduct electricity. It is the presence of dissolved substances that allows water to conduct. So what we hope to accomplish with the salt is connectivity - which moulin dumps into which vent? This sounds simple enough and we hope it is. We might miss completely and our salt may flow out of a vent other than the one we sample from.Once we make connections we will then use the dye for more detailed study of the flow. What we wonder right now is whether or not the conductivity will rise enough to be detected. We hope to find out soon. Till tomorrow.....
Contact the TEA in the field at .
If you cannot connect through your browser, copy the TEA's e-mail address in the "To:" line of your favorite e-mail package.